加拿大essay代写,paper代写,Homework代写-致远教育

essay代寫,代寫assignment,paper代寫,代寫留學作業,英國作業

導航切換

QQ:
1067665373

二維碼

代寫coursework:Management accounting

瀏覽:加拿大essay代写,paper代写,Homework代写-致远教育 日期:2019-06-15

Provisional Coursework
管理會計系統的存在有助于管理者計劃(戰術和戰略),控制和決策。任何管理會計系統的目標都應該是以某種方式支持這些管理活動中的一項或多項。
對于這項任務,您應該將現代(后機械化)管理會計技術與具有相同(或類似)目標的傳統技術進行比較。寫一份2000字的報告,其中你:
•參考適當的研究證據(使用哈佛參考)和您自己的分析,討論每種技術的目標、優勢和弱點。
•將技術與其在管理會計發展中的地位聯系起來。

來源
需要查閱的有用期刊包括:
管理會計研究
管理會計研究雜志
國際會計雜志
會計審計與問責制雜志
會計審查
會計研究雜志
會計與商業研究
技術
傳統技術包括(但不限于):
成本加成定價
基于體積的間接吸收
投資回報率
預算設置
盈虧平衡分析
DCF
彈性預算
預測
邊際成本法
模擬
標準成本法
轉讓定價
方差分析
后機械技術包括(但不限于):
目標成本法
作業成本法
平衡記分卡
基于活動的預算
基于活動的成本管理
標桿管理
客戶盈利能力分析
分銷渠道盈利能力分析
生命周期成本計算
非財務績效指標
質量成本分析
資源消耗核算
風險分析
目標成本法
學習目標
•考慮到傳統和新方法,對主要管理會計系統表示贊賞
•嚴格評估管理會計變更的方向
Executive Summary

The aim of this report is to argue how management accounting systems function in the decision making processes in management activities, by taking the volume based overhead absorption and the activity based costing for an instance.

This report will comprise the introduction and evaluation of the volume based overhead absorption and the activity based costing, their function in decision making process, the distinctions between them, and an optimized suggestion of approach to this kind of accounting system. And the evaluation of these two management accounting approaches will be hinged on their effectiveness in decision making, including their objectives, strengths and weaknesses.

Introduction

It is known that management accounting is an internal business function that includes the recording and reporting of a company's financial transactions. The accounting systems are supposed to support management in different business operations, providing analysis and support for different decisions and investments (Vitez, 2012). And the whole actions in a company, however, can be divided into several parts as designing, modeling, purchase, produce, marketing and delivering, and after sales services (Braun, et al, 2011). The financial accounting only requires taking the purchasing and producing periods into consideration when it comes to costing calculating, but actually, the whole six processes are supposed to be considered if the company need to earn profit. So here comes a significant question: how to define the cost. This question is the most basic one in managerial decision making, for it involves in many other activities such as pricing, cost volume profit analysis, budget volume variances analysis, and special order decisions.

The approaches used by management accounting to calculate the cost of goods is definitely different from financial accounting. This difference mainly exists in the allocation of overhead costing. For all the costs, it is easy to trace the direct cost into the products, so the main problem lies in the absorption of the indirect costs. Indirect costs are those that cannot be traced into specific products directly. This causes difficulties in establishing how much a product or service actually costs in total. Here there are two approaches to overhead costing: one is called volume based overhead absorption, which is a traditional absorption costing approach; the other is called activity based costing, which is a one put forward in the academic works in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s (Indirectcost. 2012).

The Volume Based Absorption Costing

The purpose of overhead absorption is to share out indirect costs, which is also called overheads, between the various cost objects, for example, products or services, on some appropriate basis. In this way we can attempt to establish the full cost, total absorption cost, of every item produced or service offered.

This traditional costing method often uses four steps to allocate the overheads.

The first step is to analyze the existing financial statements of last periods to re-distribute all the overheads so that they can be all divided into the departments that actually produce the products. For example, in a manufacturing company that produces tables, the two main production centers are assembly and painting, so all the overhead costs occurred during the process of administration, delivering, marketing and so on are supposed to be analyzed and eventually be allocated into the two producing centers: assembly and painting. In this step, the overhead allocation and absorption basis should be decided and the predetermined rates should be calculated separately. These rates will be used in the following steps.

The second step is to allocate the actual overhead costs happened in this period into the product centers basing on the overhead allocation and absorption basis and the predetermined rates. Now the overheads of administration, delivering, marketing and so on are zero and all the costs are split into two centers: assembly and painting.

Now we are now in a position to calculate the full (absorption) cost of each product. This will vary depending on how the business chooses to absorb, or to recover, the overhead costs, all of which are in assembly and painting center, into each product.

In practice, under the traditional methodologies, there are a huge number of different overhead recovery methods which can be applied. And the most often considered ones are two commonly used overhead recovery methods, one is based on labor hours and the other is based on machine hours used in the two production departments. So here it comes the third step, to allocate all the overhead costs into each single product by using the basis of labor hours or machine hours every product uses.

Finally, the forth step, add the direct cost to the allocated indirect cost then you can get the result of the full unit cost.

 


上一篇:沒有了
在線客服

在線客服

售前咨詢
售后咨詢
微信號
Essay_Cheery
微信
新西兰代写,代写论文,paper代写,Essay代寫,代做功課-浩天教育 美国论文代写,essay代写,留学生作业代做-留学写作网 马来西亚代写,essay代写,留学生网课代修代考,论文代写-小精灵代写 美国Assignment代写,Economic代写,留学作业代写-RMTNR北美代写 美国作业代写,网课代考,cs代写,论文代写-ESSAYSHIFU 墨尔本代写,博士论文代写,网课代修,exam代考-熊猫代写 悉尼essay代写,CS代码代写,CS编程代写-熊猫人代写 澳洲CS assignment代写,c++/c代写,python代做-SimpleTense 悉尼代写,商科assignment代写,网课代修,论文加急-OnlyEssay 澳洲作业代写,essay代写,网课代修,exam代考-ESSAYSHIFU